Hello, you are not signed on.
[ Blogs.starwars.com ]

Dantooine Farmer's Weekly
date posted: Jan 13, 2006 9:19 AM
My impressions of King Kong
I saw King Kong a couple of nights ago, and I was amazed. I had so many thoughts throughout the film, and some feelings I've maybe never felt whilst watching a film.

I'm generally not a big fan of film remakes, preferring to watch something more original, but this I loved. King Kong is possibly the best film I've ever seen. Not my favourite film, but one that was very well made. As a side note, the 12A rating (UK) still puzzles me. The film was in parts scary, at least for young children.

When I saw the trailer months ago I knew I wanted to see it when it was released. The fight scene between Kong and a dinosaur enticed me along with the inclusion of Jack Black. When Jack Black came on screen I couldn't help but smile, although his role was actually rather serious. He plays Carl Denham, a rather deceitful and unrepentant film maker who is the real antagonist of the story. He takes his actors and crew to Skull Island, the habitat of many strange and lethal creatures, and throughout is eager to film, risking lives in the process. In some ways the film is about a film being filmed, back in the 30s, which would have been present day when the original was released.

Some of the visuals were stunning. I don't like to go on about CGI and visual effects as I feel you can often focus on this rather than what happens in the film. But I love realism, and through the visuals and the sequence of events on screen I believe the film achieved this, as much as was possible.

Before the film I hadn't given much thought to how the story would go. We've all seen the famous image of Kong on top of the skyscraper, swiping at the passing aeroplanes, but it wasn't until part way through the film that I actually thought about this scene appearing in this version. Because I haven't seen the original I can't comment on how much of the original was included or omitted.

As Kong stood atop the skyscraper I felt my stomach go funny at the height, and marvelled at how good a story King Kong really is - a ginormous gorilla who is brought to the city and his relationship with a human - Ann Darrow. I genuinely felt sorry for Kong, as he was shot at by the planes. My brother raised an interesting point - what else could the humans have done with Kong? But the blame is really on Carl Denham, the film director who fought to bring Kong back to America; who looks upon the dead ape with no remorse for his actions.

I think one of the reasons why I enjoyed the film so much was the absence of marketing that had made me want to see it. The sole trailer that I had seen months ago was really the only advertising I had seen for the film, other than knowing from various sources that it was currently out at the cinema. The film started quite abruptly too, with no real opening sequence. I usually enjoy watching these, but it was a change. In fact, a lot of the film seemed to be conveyed without words, without any unnecessary chatter. Because of all this, the focus was solely on the story of the film for me.

King Kong said a lot to me about the way in which humans just exploit all we can in the pursuit of money. At the expense of many lost lives Kong was brought over to civilisation, where, with ease, destruction was caused. The Broadway-like show of Kong was cut short when he pulled free of his chains and escaped the theatre. I pondered on how temporary our world is when brought into question by a more powerful being, showing how importantly we humans view ourselves. These were pretty deep thoughts to spill from a film about a ginormous gorilla, but Kong really was that good, and in a way, emotional.

Much of the emotion came from the relationship between Ann Darrow and Kong. She seemed to be the only thing that had truly made Kong happy in his lifetime. And this is one of the great things about the way the story is told. We see the transformation of Kong, his changing mentality from one of beast to something more caring.

I would certainly recommend King Kong, to any film goer.

Further reading: King Kong official website

  Kenobi-fan
The Jundland Wastes Journal
date Posted: Jan 13, 2006 9:59 AM
lot of the film seemed to be conveyed without words, without any unnecessary chatter.
I agree entirely. We didn't hear endless commentary on the what Kong was, what he was supposed to represent, how he might have developed, and so on. The images and actions of the characters were strong enough to detail what they were about without hammering us with it. Additionally, it provided social commentary without being self-righteous. It's a true adventure movie and expressed PJ's love of the film-going experience in as much as it did about movies themselves. I liked it.
  Zelaskowski
date Posted: Jan 13, 2006 10:01 AM
I have seen the movie three times now and completely LOVE it. The fact that Anne has almost no lines when she is with Kong, makes their "relationship" so much more believable. It is very close to the original. Oneof the reasons this was considered a "horror" movie in the 30's, is that no one had studied gorillas. The public, in general, thought they were meat eating giants. Very scary. Now that we know so much about them, it is so much more poignant that Kong is alone. No longer as scary, much more pitiful. Absolutely a four lightsaber movie!!!
Darth Rex0
So be it....
date Posted: Jan 13, 2006 10:15 AM
You are the first review of the movie I've read that didn't complain about the length of the movie. Props to focusing on the actual movie and giving a very inciteful review. I haven't seen it yet (hard to find a babysitter for a 4 hour event, 5 if you count dinner), but I will see it soon.
  macewindu882
Don't Go All Chewie On Me!
date Posted: Jan 13, 2006 11:39 AM
I am seeing it again for the second time tonight. Man, it was awe-inspiring.
  Brother Jephso
Dantooine Farmer's Weekly
date Posted: Jan 14, 2006 7:58 AM
I agree entirely. We didn't hear endless commentary on the what Kong was, what he was supposed to represent, how he might have developed, and so on. The images and actions of the characters were strong enough to detail what they were about without hammering us with it. Additionally, it provided social commentary without being self-righteous. It's a true adventure movie and expressed PJ's love of the film-going experience in as much as it did about movies themselves. I liked it.

Very true. And thanks for all the other comments guys.
  RJ-1 Kenobi
Journal of the Wibbles
date Posted: Jan 15, 2006 1:27 PM
> Because I haven't seen the original I can't comment on how much of the original was included or omitted.

Pretty much every scene from the original is reproduced faithfully. Then the whole thing is padded out with a lot more character scenes (good) and a lot more unnecessary encounters with random monsters (bad). The T-Rex fight was a classic part of the original, though - right down to Kong checking his jaw was really broken! :D

My opinion will always be biased from seeing the original first, but yeah, it's a good remake. (Better than the awful '76 version, at any rate!)

> My brother raised an interesting point - what else could the humans have done with Kong?

Why not knock him out again and take him back home?
  Brother Jephso
Dantooine Farmer's Weekly
date Posted: Jan 16, 2006 11:14 AM
Why not knock him out again and take him back home?

Yeah, didn't think of that one.
  • Please log in to post comments