Hello, you are not signed on.
[ Blogs.starwars.com ]

Infinite Galaxy Of Fun - (Retired Archive)
date posted: Apr 25, 2006 4:01 PM  |  updated: May 03, 2006 7:42 PM
Climate Of Fear: Palpatine's Manipulation Of The Truth
A few weeks back, I had written an article about how many people expressed complaints with wikipedia and its offshoots. Around the same time I was re-reading George Orwell's 1984 and it got me thinking that wikiism held a real danger in the sense that many people were foolish enough to believe whatever was written in a wiki as absolute gospel and that led to a dangerous path. If a few people controlled information, and skewed it to serve their views or aims, and if the majority of people believed whatever was written, in essence the truth itself could be fabricated.

Coincidentally, Karen Traviss commented in my blog about doing an entry relating to her upcoming Insider fiction "Odds" which also coincidentally dealt with the same type of an issue. And so here we are, in a bit of cross blog collaboration which will pan out over the next few days. Thanks of course to her for writing another excellent story and for the opportunity of delving into this compelling issue.

I'll be looking at many various aspects of Palpatine's deceit as evidenced in Odds, much like my series on Palpatine. But this time, I'll be stepping outside of my usual form in relating it not only to the real world but especially to Orwell's book.

For those of you who may be unfamiliar with 1984, it was a tale of the future in which a single political party controls all aspects of life, and all its citizens are under constant surveillance, even at home. The phrase "Big brother is watching" refers to that constant surveillance, and it is commonly referenced even today. But an even more compelling aspect beyond the lack of privacy is how the government alters the news, facts, even past history in order to make it serve their aims. And the populace is none the wiser, and believes whatever the government says.

So, without any further preamble, let's get into it.

--------------------------------

What would it take for you to have absolute faith in a man, a group, a government that you have never had actual contact with?

A common purpose? An alliance? A time of war in which people rally behind their leaders?

What would it take for you to cast logic and reasoning aside, toss out your gut instincts, and stop asking questions?

How long would it take before you forgot how to ask the right questions altogether?

How easily can you be manipulated?

From the very beginning, Palpatine was a born politician. Though he relied on the powers of the Dark Side and was in essence a true Sith Lord, he realized that it was not the Force that would lead to the ultimate Sith victory. He knew that deception was the key to victory: it was all about plotting and cold-blooded strategy. That is why he succeeded where other Sith failed when he took down the Jedi.

Like many politicians in our own world, Palpatine knew that the foundation to fighting any war was to first create a climate of fear and necessity. He used fear to rally the Republic around him as a guiding light for Democracy. He used fear to convince people to have faith in his government. He used fear to justify the steps he took to protect the Republic from the Separatists at all costs. Necessity was also important. Before the Jedi could even question the morality of a Clone Army, they were pressed into action to counter the droid threat. Before the Senate could consider the ramifications of giving Palpatine emergency powers, the necessity of the crisis sped them to vote in favor of that resolution.

The manipulation of fear in others has always been a key tenet of Sith teachings; Palpatine just did it on a far larger scale. Before anyone had time to think and consider their actions, they were thrust into the war of Palpatine's design. The Republic simply had to make sacrifices in order to win.

But that's the real trick isn't it? The objective of war is to win, and if sacrificing a few principles or bending a few rules ends the war quicker and with fewer casualties for our side, why not take such measures?

One might say that's sound judgment. Sometimes the best decision tactically is not the best decision morally. But sacrifices are made. Is it better to assault an enemy city and lose 50,000 men or bomb it to dust, lose no men, but kill 100,000 civilians along with the enemy soldiers? Who's to say which lives are more important, those of your fighting men or the enemy's civs?

Such was the case with the Clone Wars, except the sacrifice of principles and morality all played into the hands of Palpatine. In history, when freedoms are taken in war, after the war they are returned in most cases. But in the Clone Wars, each amendment played into Palpatine's hands, as he and his followers consolidated power while cultivating popularity with the citizenry that would allow them to form the Empire with no conflict.

Fear and necessity led to the downfall of the Republic, and the rise of the Empire. Wasn't it "necessary" to create the Empire and a safe and secure society because of the "fear" of the enemy?

In "Odds", Palpatine manipulates the war on four levels:

1. He limits the size of the Clone Army
2. He lies about the true numbers of the Separatist forces
3. He intentionally spreads the GAR thin through poor tactics on many fronts
4. He ensures that the GAR isn't given too much of an advantage in kit and armor, such as stealth coating

This all goes back to Orwell.

In the book, there are three major world powers which are all totalitarian and are in a state of perpetual war. Why? War creates a climate of fear, but most of all, war uses up supplies and goods. If goods are produced and there are plenty, then everyone has plenty and everyone's standard of living increases. But by stretching resources thin through war, the populace is kept down, poor and ignorant. In the Clone Wars, the clones aren't given camouflage or stealth armor, that would put them at an advantage. We can't have the war ended too early now, can we?

Though a lack of proper supply distribution, the GAR is kept down, and the populace experiences the shortages of war. By making the populace unhappy, you make them yearn for the war's end as quick as possible at any price. You make them latch on to Palpatine as a savior.

Then, there's the perpetual nature of war. By stretching the Republic forces thin on many fronts, no decisive action is taken, no significant progress made. Also, the numbers of the clones are limited to prevent any advantage and to keep the GAR stretched thin. The war, the status quo, and the climate of fear continue until the Jedi are weakened and Palpatine has consolidated control.

Finally, there's the real heart of the issue, without which all else would not be possible. Palpatine lies about the numbers of the droid army. He makes the threat seem greater, and makes the dire sacrifices of morality and democracy seem necessary. What's a few freedoms compared to your life, right?

Once Palpatine had the climate of fear of on his side, and once he had established his credibility, he could do anything he wanted. In Orwell's book, the government routinely made up facts, and erased history itself to suit its aims, much like Palpatine did following the creation of the Empire with his information purges.

"He who controls the past controls the present, and he who controls the present controls the future."

Through his deceptions that he fed the galaxy, the people believed that the droids had greater numbers than they really did. He made them believe a force of quadrillions was threatening to overrun them and destroy their very way of life. But it was the Dark Lord himself that was destroying their way of life.

When a small group of people become so trusted, and when they are in charge of all the information we receive, it is a recipe for destruction. There was some degree of typical propaganda, yes, but the worst of it was that Palpatine actually made things up. He outright deceived the Republic, who in their naivety trusted him unquestionably.

Palpatine controlled the truth itself, because the Republic let him. The people did his bidding and allowed him to become Emperor. The GAR did the dying while he consolidated power. And the Jedi paid the ultimate price because of their lack of vision.

Through the trust of all, Palpatine managed to control the truth himself, delivered to him on a silver platter.

Think this is all fantasy? Think again. It's happened before, and it'll happen again.


"Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country." - Hermann Goering

  Anakin SoloOrganaSkywalker
Are the Sith all gone forever...?
date Posted: Apr 25, 2006 4:50 PM
Hey TIF, amazing blog, nice parallels, indeed!

Just one thought I'd like to share with you on 1984: I understood the political climate described in the book, the state of the three countries being at perpetual war, as one of the lies of the party: There are no other nations, there is only one, worldwide. It simply tricks the people into believing there was war, to justify the harsh conditions. But actual war would be a justification for that. But, since they don't have any kind of procuring trait of character, it appears to be more typical for the party to lie in this respect as well!
  Anakin SoloOrganaSkywalker
Are the Sith all gone forever...?
date Posted: Apr 25, 2006 4:50 PM
In this vein:

I always liked to think of Palpatine as having initiated, or at least secretly nurtured the Rebellion, to uphold the entire Imperial military by posing a (minor) constant thread!
  The Infinite Force
Infinite Galaxy Of Fun - (Retired Archive)
date Posted: Apr 25, 2006 5:16 PM
There are no other nations, there is only one, worldwide.

That was implied as possible, in fact the lead character began to believe the rocket bombs fired on London were done so by their own government to keep them afraid.

I always liked to think of Palpatine as having initiated, or at least secretly nurtured the Rebellion, to uphold the entire Imperial military by posing a (minor) constant thread!

While he certainly welcomed rebellion for that reason, we may yet see that he helped it along as well as the post ROTS EU unfolds....an interesting theory.
  Qymaen-Grievous
date Posted: Apr 25, 2006 6:29 PM
Great entry! :)
Palpatine & Co. were adepts at manipulating the release of information and the way it was presented to the public. His methods remind me of the Nazis - specially of Joseph Goebbels - and the way they distorted information to make the German people do their bidding during the 1930s and WW II.
It's a scary thought that such things could happen or could be happening right now in our world.:|
  Son of a Bith
The Cantina Corner
date Posted: Apr 25, 2006 6:48 PM
I'll be the one to protect you from your enemies and all your demons.

I'll be the one to protect you from your will to survive and the voice of reason.

I'll be the one to protect you from your enemies and your choices son. They're one and the same. I must isolate you. Isolate and save you from yourself.

Lay your head down child, I won't let the boogeyman come.

A Perfect Circle- Pet
  Son of a Bith
The Cantina Corner
date Posted: Apr 25, 2006 6:52 PM
I read 1984 on the advice of my freshman year history teacher. I read it my sophomore year. It blew me away. It is one of my favorite pieces of literature of all time.

:D
  Wampa_Jedi
Jedi Wampa's Playhouse
date Posted: Apr 25, 2006 7:02 PM
I would add two things only (because it was a fantastic blog)

1) Palps didn't act alone. He had at least a handful of advisor that knew he was a Sith and they helped him craft the lies. It would have been possible, just much harder to do it alone. Having your "inner cabal" helping makes being an evil dictator that much easier.

2) on the freedoms being returned after a war, here's where Palps really hit his stride. Obviously some things the people realized were gone forever, but he made it seem like he was giving some of those freedoms back to the people. He wasn't, but he (like his portrayer), was a fantastic actor.
  ywingempress
Shroud of the Dark Side
date Posted: Apr 25, 2006 8:32 PM
O'Brien explaining the Party's view of power and why they seek it: "The Party seeks power entirely for its own sake. We are not interested in the good of others; we are interested solely in power. .... We are different from all oligarchies of the past, in that we know what we are doing. All the others, even those who resembled ourselves, were cowards and hypocrites. The German Nazis and the Russian Communists came very close to us in their methods, but they never had the courage to recognise their own motives. They pretended, perhaps they even believed, that they had seized power unwillingly and for a limited time, and that just round the corner there lay a paradise where human beings would be free and equal.
  ywingempress
Shroud of the Dark Side
date Posted: Apr 25, 2006 8:33 PM
(cont.)
We are not like that. We know that no one ever seizes power with the intention of relinquishing it. Power is not a means; it is an end. One does not establish a dictatorship in order to safeguard a revolution; one makes the revolution in order to establish the dictatorship. The object of persecution is persecution. The object of torture is torture. The object of power is power."

I re-read 1984 recently to get more insights into the Clone Wars, but that quote reminded me SO much of a certain "all who gain power are afraid to lose it" conversation in RotS. Yep, Palpatine knew what he was doing. (Until he underestimated the effect a certain farmboy could have on his father, that is. ;))

Great entry. :)
NerfHerdersAnonymous
Life, the Star Wars Universe and Everything
date Posted: Apr 25, 2006 10:33 PM
So often I want to have faith in man, (govt's, etc) but so much proves I shouldn't have any.

What would it take for you to cast logic and reasoning aside, toss out your gut instincts, and stop asking questions?

What's scary is so many people are in complete denial about the world and its leaders (especially their own). The enemy always seems to be "them", the other side or those far away. ...so, apparently it takes very little.

Thanks for the entry. :)
LM
The Stooge
Star Wars Joke-A-Day
date Posted: Apr 25, 2006 10:37 PM
Though he relied on the powers of the Dark Side... he realized that it was not the Force that would lead to the ultimate Sith victory. He knew that deception was the key to victory: it was all about plotting and cold-blooded strategy.

Nice idea, but there's no canonical evidence to support it. The saga has plenty of Palpatine's rants about fulfilling destiny, the dark side being stronger, how "everything is proceeding as I have forseen," etc. He didn't just happen to be a Sith, he relied on the Force specifically to guide his actions. And the Force did so, while also diminishing the Jedi ability to see the future. This, more than anything else, was key to Palpatine's success.
JediMasterPickles
Slowly Turning To The Dark Side!
date Posted: Apr 25, 2006 11:12 PM
To echo the other comments, Excellent blog, 1984 and the PT do mirror aspects of each other but ..

What would it take for you to have absolute faith in a man, a group, a government that you have never had actual contact with?

A time of war in which people rally behind their leaders?

What would it take for you to cast logic and reasoning aside, toss out your gut instincts, and stop asking questions?

How long would it take before you forgot how to ask the right questions altogether?

How easily can you be manipulated?


He knew that deception was the key to victory

Reminiscant of situations not too long ago in America and England against our middle eastern neighbours also! ;
  Darth Vadere
The View of the Vu'traat Tay'haai
date Posted: Apr 26, 2006 4:26 AM
A very thought provoking blog. My compliments.
  The Infinite Force
Infinite Galaxy Of Fun - (Retired Archive)
date Posted: Apr 26, 2006 9:19 AM
Nice idea, but there's no canonical evidence to support it.

Hmm...maybe the entire prequel EU? And the films themselves? It was not the Force that caused the blockade of Naboo and the unlikely rise of Palpatine to Chancellor. It was not the Force that plunged the galaxy into a war controlled by one man. It was not the Force that led to consolidation of Palpatine's power base and the creation of the Empire.

It was politics and planning. You can't use the Force to manipulate an entire galaxy of people. Even the name "Sidious" is a form of "insidious" which means secretive and devious. An appropriate moniker.
  Wampa_Jedi
Jedi Wampa's Playhouse
date Posted: Apr 26, 2006 11:36 AM
...he relied on the Force specifically to guide his actions...

Way back in the day, I used to play the White Wolf line of role palying games. I remember at one point there was a great debate about "past villains" in real life being translated into the games. There were numerous historical "villains" that were fictionalized into either supernatural beings or being controlled by such.

What does this have to do with anything? The debate and decision came that not everyone that did bad things was under supernatural control. Sometimes there are just powerful, evil people. Palpatine was one of these.
(cont'd)
  Wampa_Jedi
Jedi Wampa's Playhouse
date Posted: Apr 26, 2006 11:38 AM

Palpatine had abilities that were beyond those of normal men and women, but he used those abilities as another tool. This, actually, is the basis of the Sith. Jedi let the Force control them, while the Sith bend the Force to their own will. The Force did not throw the galaxy into war. The Force did not make anyone do anything, it just helped with what Palps wanted to do anyway.

Hope this rambling made some touch of sense.
  Eirtaé
Rebel Heart
date Posted: Apr 26, 2006 11:55 AM
This is such a great blog entry IF!! Wonderful work! And now you gave me another reason to read 1984...
The Stooge
Star Wars Joke-A-Day
date Posted: Apr 26, 2006 12:41 PM
maybe the entire prequel EU?

I said canonical, as in GL's vision. He doesn't read EU.

And the films themselves? It was not the Force that caused the blockade of Naboo and the unlikely rise of Palpatine to Chancellor. It was not the Force that plunged the galaxy into a war controlled by one man.

Palps relied on the Force to see the future, and since the Force was "balancing itself out," how do we know It wasn't telling him what to do? It certainly wasn't favoring the Jedi.

My point was that Palpatine was a much more "religious" man than he was a schemer. Time and again, he credits his success to the dark side. Maybe he was tellin' the truth.
  Ello137
Apocalypse Later
date Posted: Apr 26, 2006 2:08 PM
I said canonical, as in GL's vision. He doesn't read EU.

Lets not get into that here. Also, do you see Palps mindtrick anybody? No. His manipulation is not pure Force. While of course it allows him to consistently come out on top by reading ppl and situations, he is not standing around waving his hands at people and changing their minds.

It's a good blog. I think that a good example of your point is Terry Pratchet's Lord Vetinari: He starts most plots against himself to keep tabs on them.
The Stooge
Star Wars Joke-A-Day
date Posted: Apr 26, 2006 2:15 PM
Lets not get into that here.

Good point. Just wanted to give my definition -- since it was just that, and not an attack, per se, on the EU.

Also, do you see Palps mindtrick anybody?

If I could see the future, I wouldn't need to mindtrick anyone! :p
  Wampa_Jedi
Jedi Wampa's Playhouse
date Posted: Apr 26, 2006 2:22 PM
The Force is a neutral entity in all of this. It all depends on how it's used. The Force was "for" Palpatine or "against" the Jedi. Storms aren't brewed up because they want the baseball game to be postponed. Droughts don't happen because they want a million people to starve.

The Force is part of nature. It really doesn't (and can't) care about what happens. A chosen few, on both sides, have the ability to tap into this resource, but it's still nature and really doesn't decide who wins or loses.

(cont'd)
  Wampa_Jedi
Jedi Wampa's Playhouse
date Posted: Apr 26, 2006 2:22 PM

Palpatine knew how to use this to his advantage. To continue my weather analogy, the US military often strikes in rain and at night (which is considered a weather condition). Nature doesn't care about who wins a battle, but we have the technology to take advantage of this resource.

To quote the song, that's just the way it is....
The Stooge
Star Wars Joke-A-Day
date Posted: Apr 26, 2006 2:36 PM
The Force is a neutral entity in all of this... It really doesn't (and can't) care about what happens.

So why did the Force need "balance" and decide to spawn a little Ani?
Why did Mace complain to Yoda that their ability to use the Force has been diminished?
Why was Yoda unable to see the future in the Episodes II and III, but somehow able to do so in the OT?
Why was Palpatine able to see the future quite clearly, up until he... just... couldn't?
What's with all the talk about destiny?

Clearly, the galaxy was in the process of working something out. The Force was moving in certain directions, then in others, favoring the Sith and then the Jedi.
The Stooge
Star Wars Joke-A-Day
date Posted: Apr 26, 2006 2:58 PM
If you'll indulge me, I'd just to point out that I agree with much of this blog, and I appreciate its points (and how well-written it was). Palpy clearly was a skilled manipulator, and he obviously knew how to sucker the populace into doing his bidding. I just felt that the metaphysical aspects of the Emperor's rise have been basically ignored lately among serious SW scholars. And that's a shame, since -- to me -- those ideas are the main emphasis of the movies.
  Ello137
Apocalypse Later
date Posted: Apr 26, 2006 3:46 PM
So why did the Force need "balance" and decide to spawn a little Ani?

I personally think that "balance" is a . . . mistranslation, if you will. The nature of the Force is so completely beyond us mortals that the word "balance" is a sort of shorthand for "goodfulness" to quote 1984. Not that I disagree with the remainder of your point: there clearly is some sort of destiny thing going on here, and it's not clear quite how deep or why/where/how it runs.

  Ello137
Apocalypse Later
date Posted: Apr 26, 2006 3:46 PM
If you'll indulge me, I'd just to point out that I agree with much of this blog, and I appreciate its points (and how well-written it was).

I really appreciate you taking the time to mention that. I think all to often minor and fun debates are blown out of proportion when nobody takes the time to mention that they agree with most points, so I thank you for providing that vital service here.
Karen Traviss
"Cannon to right of them, cannon to left of them...noble Three Million!"
date Posted: Apr 26, 2006 4:25 PM
It's a good blog. I think that a good example of your point is Terry Pratchet's Lord Vetinari: He starts most plots against himself to keep tabs on them.

Superb example. And there are real-life ones, so it's horribly do-able.

Can I just say I'm heartened by the standard of debate on this blog? Not only have I learned from the entry itself, the responses have been educational too.
  The Infinite Force
Infinite Galaxy Of Fun - (Retired Archive)
date Posted: Apr 26, 2006 4:26 PM
I just felt that the metaphysical aspects of the Emperor's rise have been basically ignored lately among serious SW scholars.

That is a solid point. While it does rely largely on some EU material, I have addressed that aspect of Palpatine before, especially in this one:

http://blogs.starwars.com/infiniteforce/43

Obviously, most of it is my theory, but it does offer insight into the nature of the "Chosen One" and the balance of the Force.
  Ello137
Apocalypse Later
date Posted: Apr 26, 2006 5:42 PM
Can I just say I'm heartened by the standard of debate on this blog?

Yes, KT, you can.
;

Joking aside, it is nice to find people this serious and intelligent. Non-fans make jokes about taking Star Wars too seriously, and perhaps some do, but it's always a reflection of the real world, in some way or another.
The Stooge
Star Wars Joke-A-Day
date Posted: Apr 26, 2006 6:40 PM
Thanks for the link to your previous blog, IF. Compelling stuff! You'll have to forgive my not having seen it until now -- I only got into this whole blogging thing in January, and barely have enough time to keep up on current entries.

Thanks for the intelligent and civil debate, everyone! KT and Ello is right, it's very heartening.
  Ello137
Apocalypse Later
date Posted: Apr 26, 2006 8:02 PM
Made earlier comment about "mistranslation" into blog, I've been meaning to for a while.

Dig it: http://blogs.starwars.com/apocalypselater/13
The Dark Moose
Moose Poodoo
date Posted: Apr 27, 2006 9:20 AM
It's a good blog. I think that a good example of your point is Terry Pratchet's Lord Vetinari: He starts most plots against himself to keep tabs on them.

Gotta love Vetinari - not only does he keep tabs on him, sometimes he deals with them himself. Still an assasin at heart, which is why he is where he is...

Good blog InfiniteForce..

DM out
Karen Traviss
"Cannon to right of them, cannon to left of them...noble Three Million!"
date Posted: May 01, 2006 4:40 AM
You made Club Jade headlines, mate!

Kandosii!
  The Infinite Force
Infinite Galaxy Of Fun - (Retired Archive)
date Posted: May 01, 2006 9:15 AM
Well, I couldn't have done it without your great story, but it is quite cool.

Vor entye.
bonniegrrl
Droids Just Wanna Have Fun
date Posted: May 02, 2006 10:46 AM
EXCELLENT entry! This is what I love to see in our blogs! Thanks for posting and keep this great stuff coming!
  The Infinite Force
Infinite Galaxy Of Fun - (Retired Archive)
date Posted: May 03, 2006 7:38 PM
Thanks again!
  • Please log in to post comments