Hello, you are not signed on. |
|
![[ Blogs.starwars.com ] [ Blogs.starwars.com ]](/static/skin/default/img/title_banners/site_banner.jpg) ![[ Write A Blog ]](/static/skin/default/img/nav/write_off.gif) ![[ Categories ]](/static/skin/default/img/nav/categories_off.gif) ![[ About Blogs ]](/static/skin/default/img/nav/about_off.gif) ![[ Troubleshooting ]](/static/skin/default/img/nav/troubleshooting_off.gif) 
|

 | Moose Poodoodate posted: Jun 30, 2005 10:54 AM | updated: Jan 17, 2006 10:30 PM |

 | "How is that possible?" |
 Something that I will most likely integrate into my review of the various scenes of ROTS is the interesting connection between the re-worked Empire Strikes Back scene between Vader and the Emperor, and the scene in Revenge when Vader is "born".
As we go back to that scene, as Vader awakens, his first concern is for Padme. In his Vader-modulated voice, the request sounds out of place. That voice had only had one other moment of kindliness or concern, and that was in his death scene with Luke. He asks about Padme: "Is she alright?"
"I am afraid that in your anger you killed her", the Emperor lies with faux sympathy.
"No, I felt her! She was alive!", the disbelieving Vader protests, and sets to compressing the room for recycling droids.
Fast forward twenty years or so to the revamped Emperor's Hologram scene in Empire.
"We have a new enemy," the Emperor warns. " The young Rebel who destroyed the Death Star. I have no doubt that this boy is the offspring of Anakin Skywalker."
"How is that possible?", Vader inquires.
"Search your feelings, Lord Vader," the Emperor admonishes him. "You will know it to be true. He could destroy us."
And therein is the ominous subtext between Vader and the Emperor. You see, Vader knows about Luke, but hasn't let on yet. We'll discuss that in a moment. But the last time he and Palpatine openly discussed the status of Padme, and therefore his children, was when he first awoke as the fully-transformed Vader.
"I am afraid that in your anger you killed her."
So, indeed, Vader asks a purdy dern good question here, one he probably already knows the answer to: "How is that possible?" Translation: "How do I have offspring if you told me I killed Padme, old man? Because there sure weren't any babies on that platform..."
But, as I mentioned, Vader knows full well who Luke is. He's playing a dangerous game, and hatching a dangerous plot. As I've pointed out in other commentary, "Search your feelings" has become sort of a code between Palpy and Anakin meaning a) you're in denial or b) you're lying. It was used, for instance, as Palpatine digs for intel with Anakin at the Opera House in Revenge, inferring that the Jedi are plotting a coup, and are spying on him. Anakin feebly retorts, "I don't think that-" and Palpy cuts him off - "Search your feelings, Anakin..." He called him out then, he's calling him out now, about Luke.
"Search your feelings, Lord Vader. You will know it to be true. He could destroy us."
Vader, knowing he is for the moment pinned in a lie, spill his guts, or what guts he chooses to spill: "He's just a boy. Obi-Wan can no longer help him."
The fact that he knows about Obi-Wan's involvement in helping specifically Luke means he's been gathering his own intel, and tracking this for some time. He knows exactly who Luke is, and why Obi-Wan was grooming him. But he wasn't going to share this prize with the Emperor. Because we must remember this other little comment, shortly before Anakin chokes Padme on that Mustafar platform:
"I'm stronger than him! I can overthrow him!"
Such is the nature of Sith, either newly dubbed or old and grissly - they seek power. And so this has always been Anakin's plan. But back to the scene in Empire...
The Emperor warns: "The Force is strong with him. The son of Skywalker must not become a Jedi."
And now Vader sees his plan coming together and falling apart at the same time. He was hiding this treasure of information about his son from Palpy for use at a later time. But Palpy has discovered, albeit late, that Anakin has offspring, and that Anakin is aware he has offspring now. Therefore, Vader has to put his plans into motion. He has to get Luke to join forces with him, under the guise of delivering him to the Emperor.
Vader offers, "If he could be turned, he would become a powerful ally."
The Emperor apparently takes the bait: "Yes. He would be a great asset. Can it be done?"
"He will join us or die, Master."
But the dangerous liaison is perhaps more dangerous now than we realize. Because what is being proposed here has not been accomplished by the Sith in thousands of years. Always two there are. Never three. Because with three, two will inevitably form an alliance against the remaining one. It can't be helped. They're Sith, for Force's sake. And both Palpy and Vader know this, staring at each other in this holographic exchange of veiled threats and hidden plots.
This is why on Vader's next meeting with Luke, he is nearly desperate, in that relentlessly cold Vader fashion, to recruit Luke to his side, and to reveal his identity. His own survival depends on Luke helping to destroy Palpatine. He believes it to be his destiny, their destiny.
But is it something else, something not simply born of Sith power plays? Some of that burgeoning conflict between the vestiges of Anakin against the might of Vader? Something about the lie he was told? Something about the legacy he was denied all these years?
How could Palpatine have told him he killed Padme on that platform, if he had offspring? A good question indeed, Lord Vader...
(Here's a quick thanks to all those with comments - it looks like we filled up the maximum 50 allowed)
|

 |
http://blogs.starwars.com/moosepoodo/28 |

| |
yoda´s waiter Not if anything to say about it I have!
|
date Posted: Jun 30, 2005 11:27 AM
Interesting entry Moose. Really interesting.
I touched the subject once just briefly when writing my thoughts on ANH. I think that the seeds of doubt are first planted when the Millienium Falcon lands in the Death Star and Vader says "What's that? I feeling I haven't sensed since.." and then he walks off. Within the context of ROTS, I believe he senses Luke and pretty much says. "Woah, there's a feeling I haven't felt since I was with Padmé" and I believe he instantly knows who Luke is or at least has an idea that there's a Skywalker around. I think that's when he starts plotting against the Emperor.
|

 |
The Dark Moose Moose Poodoo
|
date Posted: Jun 30, 2005 11:43 AM
Thanks, yoda's waiter - although I've always read that Vader's "Feeling" in the Death Star landing bay was really Obi-Wan, but that's another theory that it was some residulal of Padme in Luke..
The Empire scene refers to Luke as the "young rebel who destroyed the Death Star", so its my guess that both Vader and Palpatine learned of Luke's identity after the Death Star was destroyed, much as one of the novelizations seems to imply.
|

| |
Beautiful Soul Under the Twin Sunset
|
date Posted: Jun 30, 2005 12:03 PM
Great dissection of the two scenes. It's interesting how neatly they really do fit together, most likely because the new Empire scene was added recently.
It's kind of funny to think-at this point in Empire, Vader wants to recruit Luke to overthrow the Emperor and rule the Galexy as father and son, while at the same time Palpatine is hatching his own plan to use Luke as his new apprentice. Replacing Vader (as we learn in RotJ...) at his side. I think that's what you were alluding too in your post.
So-in your opinion, once Vader learned of Luke's existence, was he planning to overthrow the Emperor all along? Thinking I'll teach you to lie to me? (about killing Padme)...
|

 |
Kermit The Blog of a Frog
|
date Posted: Jun 30, 2005 12:19 PM
Very good entry, Moose. An enjoyable read, and quite true, too.
it was some residulal of Padme in Luke..
That's an interesting idea. After all, Luke and Padmé both believed the same thing: That there was still good in Vader. That Anakin was still alive, deep down inside the cold, black suit.
However I also believe it was Obi-Wan that Vader sensed, not Luke. Because if Vader sensed Luke being a possible child he would have also sensed Leia. And he was around Leia much more before he was around Luke. And Leia actually did have some minor memories of Padmé, whereas Luke didn't.
|

| |
Graffiti Somewhere on the Other Side of Mos Eisley
|
date Posted: Jun 30, 2005 12:24 PM
And also, Palpatine didn't just lie about Vader killing her, he also lied about being able to save her life. He gave Anakin this cockamamie story about Plagueis teaching him EVERYTHING he knew, and him being the only one with the power to save Padme. And then, as soon as Anakin turns and pledges himself to the Sith, Palps totally cops out on his promise and says, "Well, my master didn't REALLY teach me how to cheat death, but I'm sure we can figure it out." What load of malarkey!
I'll teach you to lie to me, indeed.
|

 |
The Dark Moose Moose Poodoo
|
date Posted: Jun 30, 2005 12:26 PM
So-in your opinion, once Vader learned of Luke's existence, was he planning to overthrow the Emperor all along? Thinking I'll teach you to lie to me? (about killing Padme)...
Actually, I think it was Vader's intention all along, as indicated by his line to Padme that he could overthrow Palpatine and they could make the galaxy the way they wanted it. But, yes, I think once he a) realized he had a son that could help him in his considerably weaker state and b) realized Palpatine had always been using and betraying him, these made for excellent excuses for him to hatch his idea, and put his dark plot in motion to finally oust the old geezer.
|

| |
Valin Kenobi Stars To Fill My Dream
|
date Posted: Jun 30, 2005 1:37 PM
Thanks, yoda's waiter - although I've always read that Vader's "Feeling" in the Death Star landing bay was really Obi-Wan, but that's another theory that it was some residulal of Padme in Luke..
Same here.
And a bit later in the conference room, doesn't he even say to Tarkin that he sensed Obi-Wan on the station?
|
| |
Valin Kenobi Stars To Fill My Dream
|
date Posted: Jun 30, 2005 1:40 PM
Actually, I think it was Vader's intention all along, as indicated by his line to Padme that he could overthrow Palpatine and they could make the galaxy the way they wanted it.
But note that the line came before he got baked and put in the suit.
That can't have been good for his psychological state. He would have been stewing in some pretty serious bitterness and self-pity, and to some degree felt he owed Palpatine for saving him on Mustafar.
|

| |
Valin Kenobi Stars To Fill My Dream
|
date Posted: Jun 30, 2005 1:44 PM
Much like a psychologically abusive spouse, Palpy would have had ways to manipulate Vader into staying with him.
Look at all the plotting that went into corrupting Anakin to begin with--once there it would be a comparatively simple matter to keep him on the leash, periodically setting him loose on some Rebels or leftover Jedi or treasonous officers, to take out his aggression on.
I'm sure Palpy milked "I rescued your crispy torso and put you in this position of power, so you owe me" as much as he could. But by the time of ROTJ--after Vader had been living under Palpy's heel for 23 years and now he knew he had a son--that just didn't cut it anymore.
|

| |
Valin Kenobi Stars To Fill My Dream
|
date Posted: Jun 30, 2005 1:52 PM
So what I'm saying is: sure Vader initally desired to overthrow Palpy, but I suspect that immediately after being rescued and put in the suit he had a change of heart--some twisted form of gratitude I guess--that may even have lasted several years. But eventually he realized being Palpy's b!tch wasn't all it was cracked up to be, and that's when he resurrected his old notion of revolution.
Yet he knew firsthand how powerful Palpy was, so even after he hatched the idea he would have been very careful to get all his ducks in a row before moving against him. Enter Luke Skywalker, and suddenly the timetable accelerates.
Sorry to be so wordy.
|
| |
Z-score The Star Wars Uncle
|
date Posted: Jun 30, 2005 1:56 PM
Simply put, it was a VERY GOOD and INTERESTING read, Moose. I enjoyed it.
|
 |
The Dark Moose Moose Poodoo
|
date Posted: Jun 30, 2005 2:43 PM
One question remains about all of this, though....How would Palpatine know of Padme's fate either way? I almost hate to ask because it spawns more questions...
My answer seems to be that when he arrived in his shuttle, he dispatched a squad of troopers to interrogate the Mustafar plant workers as to what had transpired. But even so, he would not have known her eventual fate, only that 3PO carried her aboard. More importantly though - there were none really around there, unless they watched from afar.
Aside from them, it's just 3PO, Obi-Wan, and a bunch of dead Seps. Odd. Ack. Almost hate to hit "Submit",...
|
| |
Z-score The Star Wars Uncle
|
date Posted: Jun 30, 2005 2:52 PM
Normally I would say he could tell her fate through the Force, but what about Luke and Leia and Obi-Wan still alive?....you're right too many questions....
|
| |
Valin Kenobi Stars To Fill My Dream
|
date Posted: Jun 30, 2005 3:19 PM
Good points, guys.
I'm tempted to say Palpatine was simply putting two and two together and lying to fill in the rest. Saying that Vader killed her is not technically true, so that means Palpy is either
a) Lying
or
b) Operating from incomplete or otherwise unreliable information.
Perhaps he somehow figured out what had transpired on the landing platform (security recordings?), realized that Padme was dead because her funeral was taking place on Naboo, and made an educated guess extrapolating with what he knew of Anakin's personality and angst.
It's too far out of left field (even for me  ) to float the theory that he learned from someone on Polis Massa or Tantive IV. That would just be crazy talk.
|

| |
Valin Kenobi Stars To Fill My Dream
|
date Posted: Jun 30, 2005 3:22 PM
Curse the lack of an edit feature!
What I meant by "Saying that Vader killed her is not technically true" is that Vader's attack is not what killed her, per se. She would have recovered from those; what killed her was evidently soul-crushing depression.
The "lost the will to live" thing bugs me. A much better solution would have been that she died from the trauma of childbirth combined with injury from the Force choke.
|

 |
The Dark Moose Moose Poodoo
|
date Posted: Jun 30, 2005 4:25 PM
I agree, it is technically not Vader that kills her...not in the traditional sense, at least. She dies with no medical reasons for her death - only the "broken heart" condition.
I find it hard to believe that Palpy would proceed on any information like that with incomplete facts, however. The end result is still a lie - he did not know, but used the information that best suited his needs at the time, that being the last nail in the coffin of Anakin's good nature.
|

 |
Qui-Gon-Joel Hearing the Midi-Chlorians
|
date Posted: Jun 30, 2005 7:30 PM
Great entry Dark Moose! I always look forward to what you have to say. Anyhow, about the whole Palpy knowing about Padme's death... I agree with the whole lie thoery, but just as a thought consider this...
Palpy was once the Senator of Naboo and in some sick way, may have liked to keep tabs on his ol' homestead and found out about the funeral. Although, this may not be within correct time frame. Just a thought...
|

| |
smokey3779 Jedi Master Smokey
|
date Posted: Jul 01, 2005 12:31 AM
I think you made a nice observation about Palpatine telling Vader that Luke was his son when years earlier he had told him that he (Anakin) had killed his wife (before giving birth). Vader's gotta be pissed. After giving up hope on everything because the Emperor had told him that he'd killed his family, and now knowing that there was infact something worth fighting for. For years he'd been hopelessly digging himself deeper in the dark side when something he loved was there all along worth fighting for, to save him from his personal hell. Palpatine took these feelings for granted when he trusted Vader to turn Luke.
|

| |
smokey3779 Jedi Master Smokey
|
date Posted: Jul 01, 2005 12:52 AM
Look at all the plotting that went into corrupting Anakin to begin with--once there it would be a comparatively simple matter to keep him on the leash
I always kind of looked at it that after hearing about the death of his wife he had nothing to live for so he figured he might as well be with someone who seemed to take an interest in him, not so much that Palpatine had him on a leash. just my opinion, lol.
|

| |
smokey3779 Jedi Master Smokey
|
date Posted: Jul 01, 2005 1:02 AM
When it comes to the reasoning for Padme's death, i kind of look at it that Anakin's choke did quite a bit of damage. That going hand in hand with Padme giving birth, things were really hard on her.....but not anything she couldn't recover from. Being so depressed she gave up in giving any effort to try and stay alive. Just kind of sat back, relaxed and waited for it to end. The brain is responsible for doing what it can to regulate breath, keep the heart beating, etc. Pretty much anything to keep you alive. Psychological issues can be very impressive on the actual functioning on the brain.
|
 |
The Dark Moose Moose Poodoo
|
date Posted: Jul 01, 2005 5:16 AM
Cool! thanks for all the comments everyone :0) makes me wonder if I should have made a thread instead - maybe I will to accompany
|
| |
General Tarfful The Kachirho Daily Journal
|
date Posted: Jul 01, 2005 2:26 PM
If you do make a thread, be sure to post a link here.
Regarding how Palpatine knows Padme died, perhaps he had "forseen it." He knew about Anakin's nightmares about her. Perhaps he had more faith in prophecy than Anakin. Interrogation of Mustafarian workers and other investigation (leading to the info that Anakin had Force-choked her) combined with the knowledge that he had never really unlocked the only chance of saving her (Darth Plagueis' power) probably gave him enough info to know that Padme was dead and it was possible, from Anakin's point of view, that it was his fault.
|

| |
General Tarfful The Kachirho Daily Journal
|
date Posted: Jul 01, 2005 2:26 PM
"The Emperor knew... if Anakin were to have any offspring, they would be a threat." Perhaps Palpatine suspected that Padme had lived long enough to give birth. He would surely want to conceal the presence of little Luke and Leia from Vader. Saying Anakin killed her helps with that.
|

| |
General Tarfful The Kachirho Daily Journal
|
date Posted: Jul 01, 2005 2:27 PM
Regarding the Rule of Two, the situation is oddly reminiscent of Dooku's in the opening moments of ROTS, as depicted in the novelization. Palpatine and his apprentice are looking to convert a powerful young Skywalker. Palpatine wants him to replace his apprentice, although he of course doesn't say so. The difference is that Anakin is not as naive as Dooku, and is himself planning to use this new convert to overthrow his master (as he has long yearned to).
It's incredible how much in the OT takes on a whole new meaning after Episode III.
And regarding the "somthing not simply born of Sith power plays," notice that the Episode V duel pits Anakin's old lightsaber against Vader's. Inner conflict, indeed.
|

| |
Skywalker81076
|
date Posted: Jul 01, 2005 7:21 PM
Excellent analysis of an untouched aspect of the relationship. I must admit that as I was reading your post, I was reminded of many things that I either overlooked or had forgotten. Just another example of how the Star Wars universe is much deeper than any of us have imagined, and that there is always room for another chapter.
|
| |
Outrider015
|
date Posted: Jul 01, 2005 9:19 PM
No, Palpatine knew the whole time about the offspring. He knew about the threat and therefore concealed their very existence from Anakin, as he wasn't ignorant enough to overlook Anakin's own desire for power. Remember how badly he wanted to be on the council? No, Palpy isn't that ignorant- Anakin was. He felt that he wasn't despensible, and therefore looked for means to overthrow Palpy.
|
| |
Outrider015
|
date Posted: Jul 01, 2005 9:20 PM
Then, of course, Anakin knew of the children all along- he just didn't know there were two. And, as obviously addressed, he poses the question of, "How is that possible" then the Emperor tries to bury the lie by throwing the same old "Search your feelings" as if the children somehow managed to survive Anakin's anger. Children can still be reared from a dead mother as long as it doesn't take too long.
|

| |
Malaka031
|
date Posted: Jul 01, 2005 11:56 PM
The "lost the will to live" thing was REALLY cheesy. And as much as I hate to admit it, I have to say it was LAME. But after thinking about it, I suppose a rational explanation for the whole lost the will to live bit was the fact that maybe Anakin and Padme has a special bond through the Force, or something else. Much like soulmates. And when Anakin was on the operating table, maybe he died in one form or another which caused Padme's death because of the bond. Then Vader was truly born. If thats the case, a much better explanation could have been done in the movie. But thats just my take on the scene. Otherwise i think the parallels between Anakins decent to the dark side and Lukes temptations or pretty good.
|

| |
Anakinsk89
|
date Posted: Jul 02, 2005 3:20 AM
I agree with this. Palpatine didn't know for sure if there were any offsprings, but even if he knew it he didn't know where they were. And that's why he made sure anakin wouldn't try to overthrow him. By saying padmé died. He knew that anakin/vader would try to overthrow him if anakin/vader knew he had offspring.
|
| |
Anakinsk89
|
date Posted: Jul 02, 2005 3:20 AM
......
Anakin thought he could overthrow palpatine easy when we wasn't vader. But when he became vader he wasn't that strong enough to overtrhow him. You can see it in the fight were he is fighting against obi wan in ANH. And when vader knows of it's offsprings he says against luke: ''Join me then we can rule this galaxy as vader and son.''[/b Here you can see he wants to overthrow palpatine. And wants to become Thé sith lord with luke at his side
|
| |
anakinsw77
|
date Posted: Jul 02, 2005 5:23 AM
Great points Moose! Really! It starts to make things actually fall together... cause I had always wondered about some of this stuff.... Well it would explain why after Vader cuts off Luke's arm he tells him We could rule the galaxy as father and son!
|
| |
jedimarhwini The Geeky Redneck Blog for Ladies who love Country Boys who become Sith
|
date Posted: Jul 02, 2005 6:48 AM
I must say this is the best take on a scene that I've ever read; I take my hat off to you Moose. The whole Palp./ Vader relationship is a very interesting one. I've always tried to put it in words, but you beat me to it (and did a much better job I'll admit).
|
| |
Lord Baktlar
|
date Posted: Jul 02, 2005 7:34 AM
Vader said he could overthrow the Emperor before he turned into a crippled masked man; he was just overwhelmed by his new powers. After 20 years living in a life-support suit, you settle down a bit. Vader was deeply dependent on the Emperor, I doubt he was plotting against his dear mentor. Also, to conceal her offpring, Padmé was buried with a pregnant's belly so people would think she went to the grave with her sons; that being, Vader wouldn't think Sidious was lying to him.
|

 |
Darman omega Was balance brought to the force through the Jedi Prophecy?
|
date Posted: Jul 02, 2005 7:57 AM
OK, here's how I see it. When Anakin was recued by Palpatine from Mustafar, he feels as though Obi Wan left him for dead and Palpy saved him, thus earning his full allegiance. I also agree that Vader had put two and two together about Luke, as had the Emperor, but the important part in all this is when Vader realizes that the Emperor knows about Luke(they had no reason to think about a second Child), Vader uses his past and throughs out turning Luke. Vader knows Palpatine betrayed Dooku all thos years ago for a stronger apprentice, and he knows the rule of two.
|
| |
Arrhae Tahl Arrhae's House of Fun
|
date Posted: Jul 02, 2005 7:57 AM
Aaarrghh! You're making me think.
In the morning!
But, It's something that I'd always wondered myself.....
I think old Vader knew that he had a son out there somewhere.
|

 |
Darman omega Was balance brought to the force through the Jedi Prophecy?
|
date Posted: Jul 02, 2005 7:58 AM
By Vader asking to turn Luke and the Emperor agreeing, that is the Infromation Vader needed to see that Palpatine was done with him. Remember, Palpatine said to Yoda that "Lord Vader will become more powerful than either of us." With this thought, upon eventually finding out that Vader had a son, a weakness was born. Palpatine sought to use the same measures to turn Luke that he used to turn Vader. All human emotion was driven from Vader when he was told he killed Padme. Palpatine sought to do the same with Luke by having Luke Kill Vader(his Father) with pure hate. Like I said, Vader figured it all out from his experience with Dooku. He was no fool and saw right through the offer to turn Luke.
|

 |
Darman omega Was balance brought to the force through the Jedi Prophecy?
|
date Posted: Jul 02, 2005 8:01 AM
If you read the novelization of ROTS, Mace Windu sees Palpatine's shatterpoint as Anakin himself. He sees that Palpatine completely trusts Anakin. We know that he was right because Mace is killed, but Mace saw this the other way and was more than shocked when Anakin turned on him. In ROTJ, I think that trust is still there. Palpatine truns his back on Vader and proceeds with torturously killing his son when Luke tells him he will not turn and tells the Emperor that he failed. However, this time, Palpatine is WRONG!
|

 |
Darman omega Was balance brought to the force through the Jedi Prophecy?
|
date Posted: Jul 02, 2005 8:07 AM
In this instance, as with many in these movies, use what you know to come to the conclusion that makes the most sense. Vader(Anakin) or the Emperor(Palpatine), neither are stupid. They all learned from their mistakes, however, both are human(or partly) and humans are creatures of habit, it is just a matter of noticing it. Palpatine wotked long and hard on his plot to rule the Galaxy as well as to turn Anakin. I'm sure over the course of the 23 years they spent together, Vader was able to figure that out. When Luke was discover, it did not take Vader long to see Palpatine's next plan forming, and he new he had to head it off before it was too late. He would not allow his son to be corrupted as he was!!!
|

| |
Garry007 Garry's Blog
|
date Posted: Jul 02, 2005 2:27 PM
Who says Palpatine was lying anyway? When he turned up on Mustafar, he had probably just heard the announcement that Senator Padme was dead. After all, the births of Luke and Leia were kept secret. Palpatine probably assumed Vader murdered Padme. After all, how else could she die? I'm sure "a broken heart" wouldn't convince him. I'm a little confused why you think Palpatine is lying.... but, good blog anyway. I agree with the rest.
|
| |
obi-wan sicoli
|
date Posted: Jul 02, 2005 5:11 PM
It's the Sith way for the apprentice to overthrow their master. How it's always been. Whether Luke was going to be involved or not. I guess Vader wasn't very confident in himself, until he discovered an offspring of his would be a great ally.
And what a great way to get revenge on Palpatine for all his lies and deceipt, than by using Anakins and Padmes child to do it.
Sweet Irony.
|

| |
obijanekenobi
|
date Posted: Jul 02, 2005 5:27 PM
Palpatine could not have heard about Padme's death - it happens only seconds after Vader's first breath. He DID have the power to save Anakin from death, which he did. Surely no one could sustain those injuries and live. He did however, need a sacrifice. That sacrifice was Padme. He knew she died, because he took her life and used it to sustain Anakin's. He may not have been aware that the babies made it out on time. Very ironic that the power Anakin wanted to save Padme became the power to save him at her expense. Very sad.
|
 |
tattood2
|
date Posted: Jul 02, 2005 8:47 PM
hey thats pretty good,i never thought of that.it does make sense.i was trying to figure out why palp and vader were having that weird conversation in empire.i'll have to watch them movies again and again now.stormtrooper of death
|
| |
Wrath Of The Whills Two Trilogies, One Saga
|
date Posted: Jul 02, 2005 9:41 PM
As I've pointed out in other commentary, "Search your feelings" has become sort of a code between Palpy and Anakin meaning a) you're in denial or b) you're lying.
Yoda tells Obi-Wan to search his feelings. Does that mean Yoda was telling Obi-Wan that you're in denial or you're lying. When Vader tells Luke "Search your feelings" Does that mean Vader is telling Luke you're in denial or you're lying. When Leia says she has feelings of Padme is she telling Luke she is in denial or is lying. But earlier you told me I was wrong about Luke knowing that Vader was his father before Vader told him. Curious.
|

| |
Wrath Of The Whills Two Trilogies, One Saga
|
date Posted: Jul 02, 2005 9:52 PM
See, Luke always knew Vader was his father before that day on Bespin. Just like Leia knew Padme. "Somehow I always knew."
"Search your feelings. You know it to be true."
"Noooooooo."
Luke with a confused look on his face.....could it be....what?...like something out of a dream....puts his head down in shame...then looks around frantically after realizing what he always knew....just have to get out of here away from the burden of it all.....
"Luke."
"Father."
|
 |
The Dark Moose Moose Poodoo
|
date Posted: Jul 02, 2005 11:25 PM
Hmm...I think in the case of Luke, the "Search your feelings" comment was more geared toward making him sense the truth. You're right, it is a "youre in denial" comment, but that doesn't mean Luke was aware of the connection before Vader told him. Only that once told, Luke understood the connection between him and Vader through the Force.
|
 |
The Dark Moose Moose Poodoo
|
date Posted: Jul 02, 2005 11:26 PM
If Luke had truly known, then he wouldn't have also followed the "Luke", "Father" exchange with "Why didn't you tell me, Ben?". In fact, later he jumps Yoda's case about not revealing the truth to him. This implies that up until that moment that Vader told him, he had no knowledge. But once told, and having searched his feelings about it, it cleared all doubt and he had to accept the horrible truth.
|

 |
The Dark Moose Moose Poodoo
|
date Posted: Jul 02, 2005 11:39 PM
Who says Palpatine was lying anyway? When he turned up on Mustafar, he had probably just heard the announcement that Senator Padme was dead.
Because of a couple of things - firstly, it serves his purpose to make Anakin believe he killed her, right there. Anakin doesn't even believe it - "No! I felt her! She was alive!". But Palpy says this to fully drive Anakin into the Vader persona, with nothing left but hate and despair and anger. Secondly, there was no "announcement" that Padme died on Mustafar.
|

 |
The Dark Moose Moose Poodoo
|
date Posted: Jul 02, 2005 11:39 PM
There were precious few witnesses of the events as it was. The processing station itself had come to pieces, so I would think in Palpy's haste to aid Anakin, it would be hard to hunt down plant workers to find out what happened. C3PO carries Padme on board in some state - conscious or not, we don't know. But we do know she was conscious when Obi-Wan arrives to check her status.
|
 |
The Dark Moose Moose Poodoo
|
date Posted: Jul 02, 2005 11:41 PM
What it boils down to is it is a defacto falsehood - Palpatine had no more direct knowledge of Padme's death than Anakin, but chose to tell him he murdered her to complete his path to the Dark Side. But in fact, he didn't murder her at all, she died in childbirth. Intentional or not, Palpy told a lie - and given Palpy's track record, I'd lean toward intentional.
|
- Please log in to post comments

|
|
 |