Hello, you are not signed on.
[ Blogs.starwars.com ]

Random Things
by: Qui-Gon138
date posted: Jul 01, 2005 9:07 AM  | 
updated: Sep 07, 2005 8:55 AM
"There was no father": Stories of virgin motherhood
One of the issues in the prequel trilogy that has caused a lot of controversy and debate is the story of Anakin's origins. Far from having the natural father that many fans had imagined before this trilogy began, we are told in The Phantom Menace that Anakin was in fact conceived by the midi-chlorians, the foundations of life itself and the connectors to the Force. Anakin's birth is a bit of a magical mystery. Now the saga is finished, we are able to look at this issue in the proper context.

Firstly, it must be established that, however Anakin was created, he IS the chosen one, and he does fulfil the prophecy and bring balance to the Force. George Lucas has confirmed this in several interviews - balance is restored in Return of the Jedi, when Anakin kills the Emperor, and destroys the dark side shadow that was disturbing the balance of the Force. Secondly, I am also assuming that it is quite clear that Anakin does not have a natural father - the story as presented in the movies, and George Lucas's interviews on the matter, make it quite obvious to me that Anakin's birth is magical, and he does not have a natural father.

I'm not going to make a judgement on whether the virgin birth is a good story decision, or a bad story decision - I love this saga, and will look at it for what it is. All I'm going to attempt is to look at some of the issues surrounding the virgin birth, and try to clarify things a bit.

So, on we go.

Not a Christian allegory

"There are a lot of Greek gods who came down (and impregnated mortal women) and then the heroes didn't have fathers. Whether it's Hindu, Chinese or Middle Eastern, all the mythological heroes didn't have fathers. The fathers were the gods." - George Lucas, Rolling Stone, June 2005

One of the reasons the issue has proven so controversial is because, from the moment of its beginning in The Phantom Menace, parallels were immediately drawn with the New Testament, and the story of Christ. However, it appears that this is not where Lucas found his inspiration for the story. He has flatly denied that the Force is specifically based on Christian spirituality, and has also denied that Anakin's virgin birth is based on Christ's birth.

The story of the virgin birth was not something which began with Christianity - it has been part of mythology for millennia, and was used in tales long before Christianity came along. In his book "The Hero With a Thousand Faces", which was a huge influence on Lucas's story, Joseph Campbell discussed several stories of virgin motherhood throughout myths and folk-tales.

"The Buddha descended from heaven to his mother's womb in the shape of a milk-white elephant. The Aztec Coatlicue, 'She of the serpent-woven skirt', was approached by a god in the form of a ball of feathers. The chapters of Ovid's Metamorphosis swarm with nymphs beset by gods in sundry masquerades: Jove as a bull, a swan, a shower of gold. Any leaf accidentally swallowed, any nut, or even the breath of a breeze, may be enough to fertilize the ready womb. The procreating power is everywhere. And according to the whim or destiny of the hour, either a hero-savior or a world-annihilating demon may be conceived - one can never know." - Joseph Campbell, "The Hero With a Thousand Faces", p. 311-312

Another more famous story, perhaps, is that of Hercules, who also was a mortal son of a god. Anakin is a mythological hero in this tradition - the mythic story of a hero who did not have a human father, and was not created by natural human contact. To read it as a Christian allegory is an easy mistake to make, but a mistake nonetheless.

A modern virgin birth

"Now in this particular case, the gods happened to be a life-form that allows a cell to divide. So it's a metaphor: "that which brings life". I don't want to get too controversial about this - some people believe it happened in other ways, over seven days - but if you listen to biology, there's another theory, which begins with an "e". If you study microbiology, you come to the realization that this alien life-form, which has a completely different DNA, helped create life on earth and within the galaxy. It's a simplified version of relationships - that symbiotic being goes through everything. That's why Han Solo joins the Rebellion, that's why Luke saves his father. In Star Wars land, all these relationships are necessary to bring forth a greater good - and evil." - George Lucas, Rolling Stone, June 2005

The theory Lucas talks about in that quote is what is known as the "endosymbiotic theory", and the micro-organisms are mitochondria. These, Lucas has stated in the past, are the inspiration for the midi-chlorians (the word "midi-chlorian" is a combination of "mitochondria" and "chloroplast", the plant-life equivalent). Mitochondria are a microscopic life form that live inside every organic cell, and allow it to live - they convert organic matter into energy, which allows life to exist. The more mitochondria in your cells, the more energy you have. Sounds familiar, doesn't it? The endosymbiotic theory states that life in the universe came about because these different life-forms came to live together in symbiosis, rather than try to destroy each other. This provides a new spin on the story of the virgin birth - not only is Lucas basing it on classic mythology, but also on current science. This is a very modern virgin birth tale, where Anakin is not specifically created by a "god", but by microscopic life-forms, the "givers of all life" according to real-world science. It's a part-mythic, part-spiritual and part-scientific story.

How did it happen?

"Now there's a hint in the movie that there was a Sith Lord who had the power to create life. But it's left unsaid: Is Anakin a product of a super-Sith who influenced the midi-chlorians to create him, or is he simply created by the midi-chlorians to bring forth a prophecy, or was he created by the Force through the midi-chlorians? It's left up to the audience to decide. How he was born ultimately has no effect on the way he dies, because in the end the prophecy is true: Balance comes back to the force." - George Lucas, Rolling Stone, June 2005

Now we get into the technical issues of exactly how Anakin came to be. We're presented with three possibilities in the movies, which George Lucas outlined in the quote above.

The first possibility is the most simple one - that Anakin was simply conceived by the midi-chlorians themselves. This, if true, gives the midi-chlorians much more power, and makes them a more spiritual consciousness, which realised in itself that the Force needed to be balanced, and created the chosen one to do so. However, Lucas has also stated in interviews that the Force itself did have a role in the creation of Anakin, so this theory seems the most unlikely one.

The second one, strongly implied in The Phantom Menace (and mentioned in the official site's database), is that the will of the Force itself may have influenced the midichlorians to create Anakin as the chosen one. We're told in the film that Anakin was created by the midi-chlorians; we're told he may have been brought to Qui-Gon by the will of the Force; and we're told the will of the Force acts and speaks through the midi-chlorians. The implication is that Anakin may have been conceived by the Force itself, that the Force knew the time had come when the Sith would disrupt the balance of the Force, and so created Anakin to destroy the Sith. This is the most spiritual theory of all - it's a direct intervention by a higher, spiritual force, and is the closest theory to the Christian virgin birth, and to the classic Greek virgin births.

The third possibility, which is hinted at in Revenge of the Sith, is that Anakin may have been created by a Sith Lord through the Force (there's a debate about whether it could have been Darth Plagueis or Darth Sidious, but that's a debate without an answer and seemingly without end, so I won't get into that). It is claimed that there was a Sith Lord who had the power to influence the midi-chlorians, through the Force, and create life. If it's true that Anakin was created in this way, it would be the ultimate irony - that in their quest and lust for power, and their contempt for the will of the Force, the Sith inadvertently create the being who is destined to destroy them. Some fans believe that, if Anakin was created by the Sith, that closes the door on the "virgin birth" idea. However, this is not technically the case. The way a Sith would have created Anakin would be through use of both the Force, and the midi-chlorians - so the spiritual, mystical element is still there. Anakin still would not have a natural biologoical father, and he would still not have been created by human contact, but by the midi-chlorians, the foundations of all life - therefore, the virgin birth still stands, and Anakin is still a fatherless being, despite having what we may call an "unnatural Force-father". So whatever the truth, Anakin is a mystical creation.

The truth?

"It was a virgin birth in an ecosystem of symbiotic relationships ... Ultimately, I would say the Force itself created Anakin. I don't want to get into specific terms of labeling things to make it one religion or another, but basically, that's one of the foundations of the hero's journey." - George Lucas, Vanity Fair, February 2005

So, what's the truth about Anakin's creation? This is something that may be debated for decades among fans, because there is no clear answer. The Force-creation idea cannot be confirmed, and the Darth Plagueis idea is so subtle that it's hardly an explanation or a revelation. We have hints and possibilities, but the truth is unknown, until George reveals the real answer - which he may never do, since it seems he wishes to leave it a mystery, left to the individual viewer to decide for his-or-herself. The quote above suggests that it is probably the will of the Force itself, with no involvement from the Sith - however, if you pick that quote apart (as many fans have!), it does not categorically rule out the Sith having a role through the Force, so that remains a possibility.

Whatever the truth, Anakin is a mythological hero with a "special" birth - not created by natural human contact, but by the midi-chlorians, the foundation of all life, the "gods" of the Star Wars universe. He is an outsider from the very beginning, with a special destiny, a child of prophecy who struggles with this throughout the saga. The lack of a natural father is a psychological problem for him - he loses his first father-figure Qui-Gon Jinn, and Obi-Wan Kenobi becomes more a brother - only Palpatine is left to fulfil the surrogate father role, and we all know where that leads.

  Qui-Gon138
Random Things
date Posted: Jul 01, 2005 6:53 PM
iamyourmasternow - sorry, I don't understand at all. I wrote this today after thinking about it for a few days. I'm sorry if you've written something similar, but I assure you I did not read it, and there's no need to be insulting.
  smokey3779
Jedi Master Smokey
date Posted: Jul 01, 2005 11:17 PM
this is quite an essay, lol. i enjoyed very much. i especially like that you found that last quote from Vanity Fair. It reinforces, for the most part, what i've always believed in that mess that's been made of who created him or who his father might be. One thing that i did notice, was that you said that Anakin wasn't at all influenced by Christ. in the same Rolling Stone magazine you've been quoting, George Lucas said:

Question: Anakin has no father. Do Christ overtones-

answer: Oh, it's not just Christ. Christ is one of a long, long, long line of heroes who don't have fathers.

anyway, i enjoyed the blog, and thanks again for that quote, lol.
  Qui-Gon138
Random Things
date Posted: Jul 02, 2005 5:26 AM
Thanks for your comment!
Yes, if I had to lean towards an answer either way, it would probably be Force-conception - firstly I'm not convinced in anything Palpatine says, but mostly, I think that if the Sith created Anakin, a bigger deal would be made of it. Lucas played around with the idea in the first draft, but it was cut by the second draft. But the Vanity Fair quote does suggest it was the will of the Force. Although you can pick it apart and say that "the Sith would also do it THROUGH the Force itself", I think he is probably talking about the will of the Force. Hopefully he'll clear this up on the commentary, but I get the feeling he wants it left a mystery.
  Qui-Gon138
Random Things
date Posted: Jul 02, 2005 5:27 AM
And I didn't mean Lucas wasn't at all influenced by the Christ story, since Christ is a part of that motif - just that he was influenced more by the motif in general of the virgin birth, than any specific case. Christ is very much part of that. What I mean is, I think it's wrong to simply read it as a Christian allegory, when it's more a general idea.
  HaydnCeek
date Posted: Jul 02, 2005 2:37 PM
Plagueis didn't make Anakin. He was dead long before Skywalker was born, as evidenced by Maul. Palpatine did create Anakin; he used the powers he learned from Plagueis to bring into action his own dream of being at the top of his empire.
  Qui-Gon138
Random Things
date Posted: Jul 02, 2005 5:01 PM
What is it that makes you think Palpatine created Anakin? Just curious - there's so little information about this in the movies that it's hard to find the truth. The problem with Palpatine doing it is that, according to the novel, the power to create life and stop death are very much linked - if you can stop death, that means you must already have the power to create life. Palpatine himself says that. Now, in both the movie and the novel, Palpatine admits that he doesn't have the ability of Plagueis - "to cheat death is a power only one (my master) has achieved" - so it seem unlikely that he can create life, too.
  smokey3779
Jedi Master Smokey
date Posted: Jul 03, 2005 10:55 PM
good point! like you kind of mentioned before, this is such a big idea that Lucas probably would have made things a little bit more clear. Whether it was answering the question as to who or what created Anakin, or more likely that there was a clear and definite idea that Anakin was, infact, the result of a Sith manipulation of the force. You kind of have to read between the lines to even consider that the latter may be an option. That's a pretty big assumption to be made without any semi-obvious implication from Lucas. cont.
  smokey3779
Jedi Master Smokey
date Posted: Jul 03, 2005 11:27 PM
Although the quote above suggests that 'creation by Sith' is an option, i believe that when Lucas removed the idea from the script he was trying to disregard it all together. Whether it was too big a piece to put in an already long movie, or too big of a distraction from the ultimate story, or maybe it just didn't seem believalbe, it was removed. A tib-bit like this that would have recieved so much attention would have gotten more screen time. I believe that Lucas threw in the confession of 'possiblity' after the idea was leaked to the public just to generate more attention and Star Wars discussion. Just an opinion.
  Bonz Monzvert
From the horse's mouth: Anakin was created by the Sith
date Posted: Jul 04, 2005 1:57 PM
Check out Shmi's reaction in Ep. 1 when she overhears Qui-Gon's conversation with Obi-Wan. Very telling. Much like Obi-Wan's reaction in 4 when Luke asks how his father died. It would be interesting to know more of Shmi's back story... I have images that are very Rosemary's Baby... some kind of messed up Sith ritual in which Sidious and/or Plagueis manipulates the midichlorians to create Anakin. Perhaps the pregnant Shmi then escaped his/their cluthches and went into hiding on Tatooine, where she was eventually sold into slavery. And we know the rest...
  Qui-Gon138
Random Things
date Posted: Jul 17, 2005 10:38 AM
What's wonderful is that this allows us to create our own stories, since we really have nothing else to go on apart from an offhand comment about influencing midichlorians. If a Sith really did do it (already a big "if"), who was it? Did Shmi have any idea? Were the Sith watching Anakin? What were their real plans for him - to kill Shmi and try to get Anakin to join them? Why not just raise him from birth? Why run the risk of him not going to the dark side? Why create someone who the Jedi believed to be the Chosen One? There are a lot of questions if it did happen, none of which are answered. But it is fun to speculate.
XWING_FIVE
Anakin's Yellow Starfighter
date Posted: Sep 28, 2005 7:07 AM
Well, like you say, it is all open to speculation, but one thing that has always stuck out in my mind is the way Shmi reacts to the question of Anakin's fatherhood. She is very matter-of-fact. No moment of troubled reflection or hesitancy like maybe it wasn't something she felt comfortable telling Qui-Gon. instead, she seemed to really trust the Jedi - heck, she was letting her little boy leave forever with him. It may have just been an acting choice, especially considering the Plageus story probably wasn't conceived yet (no pun intended), but it seems if there was a Rosemary's Baby scenario or something more sinister, she would have reacted differently. Just a thought though.
  Qui-Gon138
Random Things
date Posted: Sep 28, 2005 10:48 AM
That's true, there's nothing about Shmi that really suggests she's hiding something. Then again, that depends on how much she knows. We don't really know how powerful Plagueis was - it is possible he could have achieved this through the Force without Shmi ever becoming aware of what he was doing.
XWING_FIVE
Anakin's Yellow Starfighter
date Posted: Oct 02, 2005 12:34 PM
That is true also. So many variables, so little time...

There are so many different versions that you can believe and Lucas left it so open to speculation. In the absence of real proof one way or the other you are really only left with the story that fits for you, the viewer. I follow the theory that Plagueis did not form the life that would later overthrow the Sith, but it is only the version that I chose, and not based on any clear rationale (or at least not a rationale that would fit here.) Good blog though!

XWING_FIVE
Anakin's Yellow Starfighter
date Posted: Oct 02, 2005 12:36 PM
Also - I guess the Rosemary's Baby comparison just reminds me of the scene in the movie that is very memorable (though passed off as a dream.) So I imagine that Shmi would realize that particular situation happened.

But from a powerful Sith Lord able to make such a thing happen from a far distance away though, as you bring up - that is a different story.
JediOrillia
Thoughts On A STAR WARS Theme
date Posted: Nov 25, 2007 10:23 AM
I wrote a blog similar to this. I guess it is similar, but it addresses the same issue. It's my blog called "Is Palpatine Anakin's Father?"
Anyway, yeah.

But from a powerful Sith Lord able to make such a thing happen from a far distance away though, as you bring up - that is a different story.

Yeah, I see where you're coming from. I think that such a thing is almost impossible, but in the Star Wars universe, who knows what is possible?

Great blog, Qui-Gon138!
  • Please log in to post comments