Hello, you are not signed on.
[ Blogs.starwars.com ]

Aren't you a little short for an egg?
date posted: Apr 10, 2006 10:03 PM  |  updated: Feb 27, 2007 5:45 PM
ˇYa basta!
I hereby present proof that there is such a thing as a Republican politician who is neither an idiot nor particularly slimy.

Last week I was watching live proceedings from the U.S. House of Representatives, via C-SPAN. I was stricken by a speech given by Rep. Ron Paul (R-Texas), which showed an admirably spirited and independent concern for the well-being of our country and the world, a rejection of a lot of the negative things the Republican party has come to stand for.

Now, don't take this as an all-out promotion of Rep. Paul's politics - I have some major disagreements with him, for example on the topic of immigration. But really, I'm impressed and inspired. Here's an excerpt:

I smell an expanded war in the Middle East, and pray that I'm wrong. I sense that circumstances [sic] will arise that demand support regardless of the danger and cost. Any lack of support, once again, will be painted as being soft on terrorism and al Qaeda. We will be told we must support Israel, support patriotism, support the troops, and defend freedom. The public too often only smells the stench of war after the killing starts. Public objection comes later on, but eventually it helps to stop the war. I worry that before we can finish the war we're in and extricate ourselves, the patriotic fervor for expanding into Iran will drown out the cries of, "enough already!"

Full speech: http://www.house.gov/paul/congrec/congrec2006/cr040506.htm

Keep in mind guys, this isn't Ralph Nader or Howard Dean or Al Franken - this is a Republican congressman from Texas. All those of you who are U.S. citizens and old enough to vote should read the rest of this (do it for me? O_O ). Really. Make time. And it wouldn't hurt the rest of you either.

RD

P.S. Thank you StarWars.com filters for teaching me what a dirty word circumstances is. :D

Update: In light of recent news (like this) suggesting that the Bush administration is considering an attack on Iran, possibly even involving nuclear weapons, MoveOn.org is running a petition to assert that the American people are strongly against the use of nuclear weapons. I'm sure not all of you are big fans of MoveOn - they champion a lot of liberal causes - but this issue has nothing to do with liberal vs. conservative, or with party lines, and it's a great opportunity for us to pool our voices and make a statement. So, if you read Rep. Paul's speech and were moved by it, or if you're just, you know, against nuking people, I urge you to at least check out this petition:

http://political.moveon.org/dontnukeiran

[Cross-posted to my other blog and elsewhere.]

  EvilDarthBear
The Grand Admiral's Club
date Posted: Apr 11, 2006 6:20 AM
Sometimes a Republican will go bad like this ;) The only way to cure them...is a bruising primary defeat.
jkthunder
Seven Pieces
date Posted: Apr 11, 2006 10:04 AM
Call me non-committal, but I claim no party affiliation, mostly due to my own moral philosophy (and unwillingness to be viewed as this or that) - but this is refreshing to see. Even though I dont agree with a lot of GOP general party slants, I have seen a fair share of individuals in the GOP with solid and rational expressions that might be outside of their party's character. Thanks for sharing.
  Son of a Bith
The Cantina Corner
date Posted: Apr 11, 2006 7:26 PM
Heard of him I have.

I like him, as well as McCain.

Mr. Paul is an avid supporter of privacy rights in the Information Age. He has gone against the Patriot Act, wiretapping, mandatory national ID-cards, abuse of RFID technology(michrochip trackers embedded in skin. seriously), etc.
Rainbow Droideka
Aren't you a little short for an egg?
date Posted: Apr 12, 2006 3:03 PM
EvilDarthBear: Unfortunately for the GOP, ousting moderates in the primaries isn't exactly going to hurt the Democrats' cause. At least, that's how I'm hoping it will work. :D

jkthunder: Glad you liked it! Personally, I'm not into party affiliation either if it means I'm supposed to think what they say instead of thinking for myself. But it can be useful sometimes if the party is generally on the same sides of the issues as I am. Or at least, for organizing against the people I disagree with. :)

SOB: That's cool. I know there are good people on both sides of the aisle. I like McCain alright too.
  EvilDarthBear
The Grand Admiral's Club
date Posted: Apr 13, 2006 11:34 AM
I wouldn't call him a Moderate. I'm fine with moderates. And, I like McCain too :x
Rainbow Droideka
Aren't you a little short for an egg?
date Posted: Apr 13, 2006 2:05 PM
I wouldn't call him a Moderate. I'm fine with moderates.

Point taken. But he does have varying views, some of which are more stereotypically Republican, some of which are not.
  Ello137
Apocalypse Later
date Posted: Apr 30, 2006 2:29 PM
I claim no party affiliation, mostly due to my own moral philosophy

I used to identify myself as a Democrat. Then I read about that study that showed politically active people respond to political statements emotionally, identifying automatically with the "home team," and officially declared myself independant. I hope that we can have a new age of less divided politics.
Rainbow Droideka
Aren't you a little short for an egg?
date Posted: Apr 30, 2006 4:57 PM
Unfortunately it doesn't especially look like that's happening anytime soon....:|
  *DarthYoda*
Tales of the Overweight Jedi: Becoming one with the Force one cheeseburger at a time...
date Posted: May 04, 2006 11:17 PM
I question the wisdom of anyone who refers to an entire party as "idiots". Wishing for less divided politics is hardly helped by lowering the debate to name calling. And the last thing I would do on this planet is recognize a propaganda filled website such as moveon.org. Your politics are clear, but I don't think your cause is helped by painting the opposition as "idiots" and/or "slimy". I think you would be better served to research the party in question rather than accept stereotypes as truth. I know that I do not wish to engage in another war and nor do I support big oil companies- but because of my affiliation, I would most likely be associated with such stereotypes.
  *DarthYoda*
Tales of the Overweight Jedi: Becoming one with the Force one cheeseburger at a time...
date Posted: May 04, 2006 11:24 PM
As for politicians, they seem to be the same regardless of party affiliation- you might reconsider holding the other side in such high regard. There are many things wrong with both parties, but I think the debate is lost when people resort to "Republicans are this and Democrats are this." Just my opinion. ciao darthyoda
Rainbow Droideka
Aren't you a little short for an egg?
date Posted: May 05, 2006 12:33 AM
Hey Darth Yoda. Thanks for chiming in.

I think you're making some unfair assumptions about my views. One of the main points of this blog was that the stereotypes aren't valid. And while I do honestly think that at this time there's more of a culture of corruption among the Republican party than the Democrats, I would absolutely not characterize the entire Republican party as idiots or slimy (certain members perhaps), and I know that the Democrats aren't perfect either. That was the point. As it turns out, I do research these things, and I'm careful to form my own opinions whenever possible. I don't have these opinions because someone on Air America or Fox News told me to - I watch C-SPAN, remember?
Rainbow Droideka
Aren't you a little short for an egg?
date Posted: May 05, 2006 12:33 AM
And it's possible that I'm a little bit biased towards the Democrats because I agree with them far more often, but there is definitely a lot of slimy and idiotic stuff going on in the government, and as far as I can tell the majority of it is happening on the Republican side. And most of the congressmen who make outrageous and unfair remarks and mischaractarize their opponents do seem to be Republicans. I'm not saying that Republicans tend to be corrupt - only that corruption (right now) seems to tend to happen on the Republican side when it does.
Rainbow Droideka
Aren't you a little short for an egg?
date Posted: May 05, 2006 12:45 AM
As for MoveOn.org, I beg to differ. While some members of the site do spin things where they shouldn't, I don't think it's correct to characterize it as a propaganda site. Sure, you shouldn't get your news from a group with an obvious political agenda (and I don't), but that doesn't mean it's not useful, or that the organization exists for the sake of propaganda. When MoveOn sends me an update with a petition to sign, I research the topic, and if I agree with them I'll sign it (if I disagree or am not sure, I won't). Used in this way, it's a very useful tool for organizing towards a cause.
Rainbow Droideka
Aren't you a little short for an egg?
date Posted: May 05, 2006 12:48 AM
And besides, MoveOn doesn't spin things any more towards the left than most of the Fox News talkshows do in the other direction. At least when MoveOn writers trash someone they explain why, and cite their sources. When Bill O'Reilly or Sean Hannity decides they don't like someone, they invite them onto the show and then do their best to make a fool of them and not let them get their side of the issue in.
Rainbow Droideka
Aren't you a little short for an egg?
date Posted: May 05, 2006 12:49 AM
By the way, I'm not assuming that you watch these shows, only providing what I think is an at least equally bad example, which most people wouldn't say is the "last thing on the planet" that they would recognize. It's only considered more reputable because Rupert Murdoch managed to buy his views a way onto national television, and because the administration is trying to make opposition appear politically incorrect.

That's my opinion. Ciao! :)
  • Please log in to post comments