Hello, you are not signed on.
[ Blogs.starwars.com ]

The Ramblin' Rodian
date posted: Aug 11, 2007 4:43 PM  |  updated: Aug 11, 2007 6:15 PM
Trak's Theories: Rodian Biology Expanded, pt I
Guess what time it is? Time to sit through another of Trak's theories! Last time we discussed a general overview of Rodian biology, and in the comments, a number of things were mentioned. This lead me to start putting together a more in-depth theory rather than what I had written before. I'm dividing it up into parts, concentrating on a specific aspect.

Today, we're gonna discuss the unique Rodian facial features. Yep, it's all about the snout! I plan to detail the diet, benefits of having a snout, and even what the underlying bone structure may look like. I wanna clarify 'fore I go on, though, that any dietary notes are based on the shape of the snout, not the size. As Yoda says, size matters not. All my speculation is based on the snout's structure.

Anywho, many references have described a Rodian's snout to be "tapir-like," and the New Essential Guide to Alien Species says that it serves as a "special filter for their finely-tuned olfactory senses." That statement alone places their sense of smell in the snout and not the antennae as some have suggested. Now, there are no indications of any type of nostrils, so either the nasal cavity is located on the upper jaw, beneath the lip, or Rodians "taste" the air. Seeing as how it's said that the snout itself aides in detecting scents, then using the tongue and palate to "taste" smells in the air would be a lot more probable.

That said, the pheromone detection would be based on taste. A Rodian would "smell" by flicking his or her tongue, much like a snake or lizard, which would catch odour molecules and transfer 'em to olfactory receptors in the mouth. Though, since the Rodians are often seen open-mouthed, then all "smelling" is done by mouth-breathing; the snout concentrating and essentially funneling scents to the olfactory receptors without tongue-flicking.

As it's been said, Rodians have a pebbly skin-surface, but their snouts are smooth. This may be due to their snouts being highly sensitive. They possibly have used their snouts to sift through soft dirt, mud, sand, or insect mounds in search of a meal. This would benefit greater if they rooted through muddy lakebeds or such in search of crustaceans. Their arms would already be occupied with swimming, thus using the snout to find food would be helpful.

If the primary diet of Rodians are insects and small crustaceans, then they would need teeth to break the shells and carapaces, right? Well, they have teeth... sort of. Click the provided hi-res link of this image and look closely at it. Notice the small ridge on the lower jaw? That's the "teeth" right there! Inside that snout, Rodians have a sharp, bony beak, much like what turtles have. This beak allows 'em to crush insect carapaces and crustacean shells. Beyond that beak, I don't think Rodians possess any real teeth. So they wouldn't chew their food. They'd probably bite their meal into smaller portions, crush it against their palate and swallow it whole, much like most reptiles.

To further aide in digestion, it's possible that a Rodian would consume small amounts of gravel or sand to grind food in the stomach. So, if Greedo ate a handful of sand prior to the cheeseburger mentioned in the previous theory, it's not because Tatooine's twin suns are melting his brain; he's just avoiding any indigestion. Think of it as natural Zantac.

Rodians could also inflict one painful nip if they wanted to. And poor George Lucas here found out the hard way. I guess Greedo wasn't very happy with the "improvements" made to his scene. Ouch!

The snout shape would allow for a very wide vocal range, and it has been indicated that Rodians hoot. Though, due to the shape of the palate and rasping beak, it apparently causes some difficulties, lisping being a common impediment for Basic-speaking Rodians.

So there you have it; my in-depth research and coverage on Rodian snouts. I don't plan on stopping here, either. The next facial feature to get some extra attention? The eyes have it. So stay tuned and be amazed at my total lack of a social life and anything better to do.

This has been another of Trak Nar's wild and crazy theories.

jedimasterpaul12
I'm A Blogger -- Like My Father Before Me
date Posted: Aug 11, 2007 9:07 PM
If the primary diet of Rodians are insects and small crustaceans, then they would need teeth to break the shells and carapaces, right? Well, they have teeth... sort of. Click the provided hi-res link of this image and look closely at it. Notice the small ridge on the lower jaw? That's the "teeth" right there! Inside that snout,

Yes! I see it! ------------Wow, It looks like he has upper teeth too! Just zoom in the hi-res pic and you'll see it!
  Captain Peabody
date Posted: Aug 11, 2007 9:20 PM
Whoa....this has got to be the most blatant case of over-analyzing I've ever seen...and I love it!

Keep up the good work! :p

Master Ki-Aaron-Mundi
I was a Teenage Jedi
date Posted: Aug 12, 2007 2:03 PM
It all sounds plausible enough to me--you clearly put some thought into this. I look forward to further installments!
  Tamdaazik
date Posted: Aug 29, 2007 12:38 PM
Very interesting stuff.
Bingo on them being arboreal, it really makes sense -- Like highly evolved jungle tree frogs.
The snouts could also have evolved to help them find grubs and nesting animals in rotted wood and tree hollows.

I've never understood them being called reptillian, i'd say they are much closer to amphibians (non-scaled skin, finger tips).

  Tamdaazik
date Posted: Aug 29, 2007 12:39 PM
Any ideas on why the females have hair (aside from a lazy artist's shortcut to identify the girls from the boys)?
My theory is that they don't. its prosthetic and decorative -- simply long natural or synthetic hair attached to their spines/tendrils, the way people with short very curly hair get hair weaves.

It makes sense, in a galaxy dominated by humans, that they would not only adapt some of the aesthetic taste of them (long silky hair), out of both personal preference and to open doors as entertainers and aid assimilation, etc.
  Tamdaazik
date Posted: Aug 29, 2007 12:40 PM

I'd think on Rodia itself it would be unheard of/frowned upon/ridiculed, but among the countless exiles and refugees on other worlds that have more contact with humans, it would be more common.

That's my story and i'm sticking with it!

(had to break this post up because of word limit)
Trak Nar
The Ramblin' Rodian
date Posted: Aug 30, 2007 7:04 PM
Yeah, hair could be a cosmetic thing, though there's some conflicting EU sources that say otherwise. Males apparently can grow hair, too, Evo the Blue (Wookieepedia him) for example. If hair were just for aesthetic value, then I'm not quite sure why males would want it, seeing as how a majourity of off-world Rodian females tend to shave their heads. Mebbe Evo's a hippy, who knows?

Though, the New Essential Guide to Alien Species says that it's actually hair and not just a "lazy artist's trick," as females have mammary glands, too.
Trak Nar
The Ramblin' Rodian
date Posted: Aug 30, 2007 7:07 PM
It's the mammalian qualities that're throwing the huge wrench into my works. I could easily shrug it off as "it's different on another planet" but that's taking the easy and lazy way out. 'Sides, no sci-fi writer got anywhere by saying "it's different there" and not putting any thought into an explanation.
  Tamdaazik
date Posted: Sep 03, 2007 3:39 PM


In anycase, do we know they're even real mammaries? In the movies we have Greeata, performing for jabba, a creature with an obvious affinity for the mammalian bipedal female form (oola and leia). Fake hair and a pair of falsies don't seem out of the question when trying to appease a powerful gangster (i'd say earth strip clubs and mafia girlfriends are a good example in our world).
  Tamdaazik
date Posted: Sep 03, 2007 3:39 PM

As for comic (and cartoon, and videogame) depictions, I take that with a grain of salt. There are certain cliches/'stylistic norms' in how things are presented in those media which im more inclined to chalk up to 'artistic embellishment' than accurate depiction.
In other words, I don't believe every, or even most female characters wear 6 inch stiletto heels and salon hair into combat while maneuvering a pair of pendulous D cup breasts above a micro waist - even if the stories they appear in are to be taken as canon. Comparing luke skywalker and leia from their comic appearances to the flesh and blood actors who established them makes that clear.
  Tamdaazik
date Posted: Sep 03, 2007 3:41 PM


And the essential guides have changed their stories from time to time.

So maybe i'm guilty of picking and choosing, but I cant help doing that with some of the stuff that's made it into the EU.

Off topic thought:
I wonder why more EU stuff (in fantasy and sci fi in general) isn't written by in-character pseudonyms (scientists, storytellers, etc) instead of trying to be so faceless and omniscient -- it makes retconning so much easier. Timothy Zahn couldn't be wrong, but could "Dak Spandoz " retelling a popular story?
Trak Nar
The Ramblin' Rodian
date Posted: Sep 03, 2007 5:42 PM
Apparently the mammaries are real, as there wasn't any indication that said that they're not. So Rodians nurse their babies.

Anywho, the first EGAS was written in-character by Senior Anthropologist Hoole. The Galactic Phrasebook and Travel Guide was also written in-character by Ebenn Q3 Baobab.
  • Please log in to post comments