Hello, you are not signed on.
[ Blogs.starwars.com ]

Journal of the Wibbles
date posted: Mar 18, 2006 5:28 AM  |  updated: Mar 18, 2006 10:09 AM
Another Galaxy
Every now and again, someone over on the message boards tries to re-write the Star Wars Prequel Trilogy how THEY would have done it.

These re-writes are always the same. Invariably, they look something like this:

Episode I:
Obi-Wan Kenobi discovers an 18-year-old Anakin Skywalker on Tatooine and decides to take him on as his apprentice, against the wishes of the Jedi Council. Obi-Wan has to train Anakin in secret. The Naboo invasion represents the start of the Clone Wars, which are the basis for the whole trilogy. There is a love triangle between Anakin, Obi-Wan and Padmé. Darth Maul survives the final duel and becomes the main villain for the rest of the trilogy, until Vader kills him and takes his place later on.

Episode II:
Obi-Wan and Anakin serve under Bail Organa in the Clone Wars, which continue to rage. Padmé and Anakin fall in love. Anakin turns to the Dark Side and becomes Darth Vader. The final battle is that good old lava palaver from Lucas's Episode III.

Episode III:
Palpatine declares himself Emperor as the Clone Wars end. Vader journeys throughout the galaxy hunting down Jedi Knights. The twins and Padmé go into hiding.

The urge to write our own versions of the prequels is an understandable one. A lot of us were dreaming what Episodes I, II and III would be like for twenty years, ever since we first saw a yellow "Episode IV: A New Hope" scrolling through space.

The problem with re-writes like the one above is that they don't offer anything new. We've already seen a teenaged Skywalker leave Tatooine on the promises of old Obi-Wan and be trained as a Jedi in secret. We've already seen a love triangle between the three main leads. We've already had a trilogy focussing on a single war. We've already had a recurring Sith villain toppled by his would-be successor (admittedly Lucas's Episode III did this too!). We've already seen Vader storming around the galaxy hunting down enemies who are on the run.

If you want six Episodes of this, just watch IV-VI twice in a row. It's not like there aren't enough different versions of them. ;)

There are quite enough parallels between the two trilogies, without creating any more. If Lucas had released the prequels like this, he would have been torn to shreds by critics (both professional and amatuer) for making nothing but an uninventive rehash of his past successes.

What the fan re-writes tend to miss out on are all the new additions Lucas added to his galaxy this time around. Gone are the noble and maverick Qui-Gon Jinn, and the regal and mysterious Count Dooku - two of Lucas's greatest characters, portrayed by two of the greatest actors in the business. Also gone are the podracing, the humour of the perpetually-confused battle droids, the steady downspiralling of the Republic (with surprisingly relevant parallels to today's politics on Earth), and more.

A lot of this happens in the name of clearing up perceived continuity errors that only exist in the mind. "Obi-Wan can't possibly have had more than one teacher - He'd have told Luke so if he had!" "Why doesn't Uncle Owen recognise a walking communication tool he owned twenty years ago in a different colour?"

Most significantly of all, I've never seen a convincing fan depiction of Anakin's fall. Most versions have him go over the edge after the loss of someone close to him (usually Padmé). But people in the real world lose loved ones all the time. Very few of them decide to subjugate the galaxy and massacre all their friends as a consequence.

By losing the child Anakin from Episode I (a decision that seems to be born of either despising children in general or a complete inability to identify with them), you lose the story of him being separated from his only parent at a very young age. You lose the death of his surrogate father and his growing up in an alien world, with only the dangerous idea that he is some all-powerful "Chosen One" to cling to. You lose his long-held, naive belief that he can remake things "the way they should be" - an idea that is at the very core of his being, and makes Episode V's "I am your father" speech all the more potent.

Anakin's turn to the Dark Side and the clash with Obi-Wan is the dramatic and emotional highlight of the trilogy. That's why it happens at the end. By shunting everything forward one film and making the "Darth Vader going round killing everybody" movie (much derided by Lucas), you end up with a very anti-climactic Episode III that's all gratuitous violence and virtually no story. Where's the interest in watching Vader repeatedly skulking around slicing up non-entities, after you've seen him battle his best friend and mentor?

There are changes I'd make to the Prequel Trilogy if it were up to me. I'd spice up the rather uninspiring first five minutes of Episode I (First impressions are all-important!). I'd ditch the confusing and unnecessary Midi-Chlorians concept. Parts of Episode II's love scenes are just too excruciating. I'd like to see bigger roles for Count Dooku and Bail Organa. I might even go into these in a future blog entry some time.

But these are all minor niggles, small tweaks that stem from personal preference. My imagination isn't up to the task of recreating the prequels wholesale, with the wealth of creativity and outstanding ideas that Lucasfilm poured into it. Nor is the imagination of anyone else who I've seen have a go at it.

Thank the Force that Lucas's imagination was. :)

  jedimaster13109
Meditations of a Star Wars Fan
date Posted: Mar 18, 2006 5:38 AM
You are absolutely right. I don't think the prequels need change at all. They work well, although your example above of what someone thought they should be like is how I thought Episode II and III would work. I thought AOTC would end with the mask lowering onto Vader's face and then the purge would be the theme for ROTS. Little did we know at that time about Order 66 and Palpatine's ability to wipe out the Jedi almost instantly. GL's way is always better.
  Tiawyn
TiaWyn's Star Wars Blog
date Posted: Mar 18, 2006 7:43 AM

"Most significantly of all, I've never seen a convincing fan depiction of Anakin's fall. Most versions have him go over the edge after the loss of someone close to him (usually Padmé). But people in the real world lose loved ones all the time. Very few of them decide to subjugate the galaxy and massacre all their friends as a consequence."

You are right. Anakin didn't turn to the dark side because he lost Padmé. He turned to the dark side trying to prevent from losing Padmé. There is a big difference. Given the chance, there are probably many people who would make this choice.

  Marvolo7
Marvolo's Misanthropic Musings
date Posted: Mar 18, 2006 8:56 AM
Excellent blog. Great points about how some fans wanted Episode III to be a Jedi slaughter-fest with no story. For Anakin, by the time that mask is lowered and he is told that Padme is dead, his character arc is over. His character does not change after that point, and his is exactly the same as we see him in the opening moments of ANH. Sticking another movie in there with Anakin as the main character is pointless. Sure, we would get lots of lightsaber duels, but as Darth Vader hunts down his 15th Jedi, this formula would surely get tiresome. There would be no character development, and no story.
  jedimasterninks
date Posted: Mar 18, 2006 2:38 PM
If I could re-write them.... I WOULDN'T
  the Mandalorian Jedi
date Posted: Mar 19, 2006 2:02 PM
The problem with the PT is that there was too much hype. It's the same with most prequals/sequals/re-makes of great movies; people expect more than can be delivered. Jar Jar didn't help either.
  luuke.skywalker
date Posted: Mar 20, 2006 9:17 AM
If I were writing the prequels, I'd have asked a professional writer to do it for me. George Lucas maybe??

If you want six Episodes of this, just watch IV-VI twice in a row. It's not like there aren't enough different versions of them. :^O

Overall, excellent blog.
  Medical Droid (mrp-7)
date Posted: Mar 20, 2006 7:52 PM
Wathing episodes IV-VI twice! LOL. And your other arguments are very well stated.

Despite all this, even you couldn't help but state your own tidbits of changes! It's natural. Discussions and "what ifs" are why were on this site. Just because someone else wants an "older" Anakin doesn't make them less right than you wanting expanded roles for the minor characters of Dooku and Organa. You can even see likenesses of these characters in the Episodes IV-VI as well: The British-accented Imperial officers make great subs for Dooku, and likewise Rebel leadership have clear echoes of Organa (ex: Mon Mothma). Plus, why the first 5 minutes of Episode I, when it's Episode II's first 20 minutes that snore? ;)
  RJ-1 Kenobi
Journal of the Wibbles
date Posted: Mar 21, 2006 10:56 AM
> Plus, why the first 5 minutes of Episode I, when it's Episode II's first 20 minutes that snore?

You can't resist it either then! ;)

I agree it's only natural to come up with "what ifs". Creative discussion and fan fiction are parts of what helps SW fandom to thrive. It's the wholesale scale of it that seems unnecessary to me.

Lucas made a very intelligent trilogy about the origins of evil, both on an individual and a (inter-)global level. Rather than expand on the intricate story he created, some people would scrap it completely and replace it with their own.

Everyone's a movie critic. But how many people look at a movie and say, "That should never have been made. They should have made this movie instead"?
  Lieutenant Wiggum Jansen
DETENTION BLOG AA23
date Posted: Mar 25, 2006 10:10 AM
By losing the child Anakin from Episode I (a decision that seems to be born of either despising children in general or a complete inability to identify with them)

How true that is. And sometimes these kid-haters have just barely left childhood themselves, and seem to have a immature need to distance themselves from...themselves, odd as it sounds. The adults with this problem almost invariably have a mixed-up idea regarding the intended audience of the films. (it's for "kids-of-all-ages". Not "cynical-film-majors-of-all-ages")
  Lieutenant Wiggum Jansen
DETENTION BLOG AA23
date Posted: Mar 25, 2006 10:11 AM
I could never re-write it; from my first viewing it surprised me, and left my mouth hanging open. I came out of the theater with a big grin on my face, and that warm feeling that I only get after glimpsing the truly legendary.
  Bravo 225
"Nice Skirt, Hand Washable?" - "Its a Kama!"
date Posted: Apr 02, 2006 8:30 AM
I like the Saga the way it is.:)
bonniegrrl
Droids Just Wanna Have Fun
date Posted: May 02, 2006 11:00 AM
Great entry!
I couldn't agree more with your arguments... ;)

Keep them coming!
We need more blogs like this!
  Fish1941
date Posted: Mar 10, 2007 10:43 PM
Now here is a blog that makes sense! There might be a few things I would consider changing, but not the romance scenes. It's very medieval and tragic . . . like the era that the PT is set in.
  • Please log in to post comments